Diskussion:Gudvangatunnel

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
Dies ist die aktuelle Version dieser Seite, zuletzt bearbeitet am 19. Mai 2019 um 06:53 Uhr durch imported>Anonym~dewiki(31560) (Neuer Abschnitt →‎Quelle. Brandschutz und monstrosity (of a tunnel)).
(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)

Quelle. Brandschutz und monstrosity (of a tunnel)

  • (englisch) «Life-threatening fire-hazard
    The Gudvanga tunnel has its lowest point ca. 15 m above sea-level [... near the entrance in Gudvangen]. The highest point is [... where the tunnel ends] in Undredalen, ca. 375 m above sea-level.»
    ... air gets sucked thru the tunnel, from the bottom to the top; the tunnel is like a 360 m chimney.
    [... small, combustible particles get spread thruout the air in the tunnel. Sources that easily ignite the particles: over-heated brakes on down-going vehicles, or engines glowing on vehicles driving up the tunnel.]
    The tunell is life-threatening. It is a monstrosity that never should have been built. [... It is only a] question of when there will be an accident [or fire-incident], larger than the previous ones.
    Build bridges ...
    Einar N. Strømmen und Tor G. Syvertsen
    prof. emeriti, Institutt for konstruksjonsteknikk, NTNU».

    Quelle: «Livsfarlig brannfelle». Klassekampen. 2019-05-36. S. 36. Servusz, 178.232.109.223 08:53, 19. Mai 2019 (CEST)