Benutzer:Ergetag/Computerdenken

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
< Benutzer:Ergetag
Dies ist die aktuelle Version dieser Seite, zuletzt bearbeitet am 18. November 2020 um 21:18 Uhr durch imported>Chewbacca2205(1567583).
(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)
Dieser Artikel (Computerdenken) ist im Entstehen begriffen und noch nicht Bestandteil der freien Enzyklopädie Wikipedia.
Wenn du dies liest:
  • Der Text kann teilweise in einer Fremdsprache verfasst, unvollständig sein oder noch ungeprüfte Aussagen enthalten.
  • Wenn du Fragen zum Thema hast, nimm am besten Kontakt mit dem Autor Ergetag auf.
Wenn du diesen Artikel überarbeitest:
  • Bitte denke daran, die Angaben im Artikel durch geeignete Quellen zu belegen und zu prüfen, ob er auch anderweitig den Richtlinien der Wikipedia entspricht (siehe Wikipedia:Artikel).
  • Nach erfolgter Übersetzung kannst du diese Vorlage entfernen und den Artikel in den Artikelnamensraum verschieben. Die entstehende Weiterleitung kannst du schnelllöschen lassen.
  • Importe inaktiver Accounts, die länger als drei Monate völlig unbearbeitet sind, werden gelöscht.

Vorlage:Infobox book

The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds and The Laws of Physics is a 1989 book by the mathematical physicist Sir Roger Penrose.

Penrose argues that human consciousness is non-algorithmic, and thus is not capable of being modeled by a conventional Turing machine, which includes a digital computer. Penrose hypothesizes that quantum mechanics plays an essential role in the understanding of human consciousness. The collapse of the quantum wavefunction is seen as playing an important role in brain function.

Most of the book is spent reviewing, for the scientifically-minded layreader, a plethora of interrelated subjects such as Newtonian physics, special and general relativity, the philosophy and limitations of mathematics, quantum physics, cosmology, and the nature of time. Penrose intermittently describes how each of these bears on his developing theme: that consciousness is not "algorithmic". Only the later portions of the book address the thesis directly.

Overview

Penrose states that his ideas on the nature of consciousness are speculative, and his thesis is considered erroneous by experts in the fields of philosophy, computer science, and robotics.[1][2][3]

Following the publication of this book, Penrose began to collaborate with Stuart Hameroff on a biological analog to quantum computation involving microtubules, which became the foundation for his subsequent book, Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness.

The Emperor's New Mind attacks the claims of artificial intelligence using the physics of computing: Penrose notes that the present home of computing lies more in the tangible world of classical mechanics than in the imponderable realm of quantum mechanics. The modern computer is a deterministic system that for the most part simply executes algorithms. Penrose shows that, by reconfiguring the boundaries of a billiard table, one might make a computer in which the billiard balls act as message carriers and their interactions act as logical decisions. The billiard-ball computer was first designed some years ago by Edward Fredkin and Tommaso Toffoli of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Recognition

Penrose won the Science Book Prize in 1990 for this book.[4]

See also

References

Vorlage:Reflist

Vorlage:Roger Penrose


[[Category:1989 non-fiction books]] [[Category:Consciousness studies]] [[Category:English-language books]] [[Category:English non-fiction books]] [[Category:Mathematics books]] [[Category:Oxford University Press books]] [[Category:Philosophy of artificial intelligence]] [[Category:Philosophy of mind literature]] [[Category:Popular physics books]] [[Category:Quantum mind]] [[Category:Science books]] [[Category:Turing machine]] [[Category:Works by Roger Penrose]]

  1. L. J. Landau: Penrose's Philosophical Error 1997, ISBN 3-540-76163-2. Archiviert vom Original am 25 January 2016.
  2. Various critical reactions to be found in Behavioral and Brain Sciences vol. 13 #4 (1990), 643–705, and vol. 16 #3 (1993), 611–622, e.g. M. Davis "How subtle is Godel’s theorem? More on Roger Penrose"
  3. M. Davis (1995), "Is mathematical insight algorithmic", Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13 (4), 659–60.
  4. Royal Society Winton Prize for Science Books: Previous winners. The Royal Society. Retrieved 12 March 2013.