Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan Kühn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2011/August

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie
< Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan Kühn‎ | Check Wikipedia
Dies ist die aktuelle Version dieser Seite, zuletzt bearbeitet am 26. Dezember 2011 um 02:10 Uhr durch imported>ArchivBot(251006) (2 Abschnitte aus Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan Kühn/Check Wikipedia archiviert).
(Unterschied) ← Nächstältere Version | Aktuelle Version (Unterschied) | Nächstjüngere Version → (Unterschied)

Ideas

Could the following checks be considered for addition?

  1. Page [[XYZ]] contains [[Category:XYZ]] where the sort key on that category is not a blank. (in other words it should be [[Category:XYZ| ]]
    • Rather: sort key is other than defined on settings page (on plwiki [[Category:XYZ| ]], [[Category:XYZ|!]] and [[Category:XYZ|*]] are used) Bulwersator 08:37, 26. Aug. 2011 (CEST)
  2. Page [[List of foo bar baz]] contains no default sort and categories without a sort key. It should have sort key "foo bar baz", I think.

Naraht (talk) 20:44, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

  1. Pages that uses <br clear=" or <div clear=" in stead of {{clear}} or {{-}}.
  2. Pages with superseded images.
  3. Templates with empty parameter slots. Example: {{foo|}}
  4. Links with empty link text. Example: [[foo|]] (where 'foo' does not contain a colon).

Thanks for a very usefull tool by the way. /83.227.130.26 20:47, 24. Aug. 2011 (CEST)

Why small is bad

Why <span style="font-size:90%;">testo</span> is better than <small>testo</small> ? Maybe small is html but suggested form way less readableBulwersator 14:13, 10. Aug. 2011 (CEST)

Yes it is HTML-Code. And we don't wont this. Normaly span is also not allowed. We should separate data and style. -- 87.157.56.225 20:59, 14. Aug. 2011 (CEST)
So both span and small are bad. So what is the point in changing <small> to messy <span style="font-size:90%;">? Bulwersator 08:49, 17. Aug. 2011 (CEST)
<small> tag is deprecated, quote of W3C: „The <tt>, <i>, <b>, <big>, and <small> tags are all font-style tags. Font-style tags are defined in HTML4, but it is strongly recommended to use CSS styling instead.“. These tags was used for styling, but till CSS exist styling should be made only thought CSS, not (X)HTML --PL Przemek 12:42, 1. Sep. 2011 (CEST).
Well, it is wikicode, not HTML (I am pretty sure that [[ ]] {{ }} is hard to use in html) Bulwersator 15:14, 10. Sep. 2011 (CEST)

Please fix jawiki links

at http://toolserver.org/~sk/cw/jawiki/index.htm, jawiki link has changed. then, not tlanslated now. Please fix the links

--123.218.110.66 02:54, 20. Aug. 2011 (CEST)

 Ok, I change this in the database and the script. -- sk 20:53, 26. Okt. 2011 (CEST)
Dieser Abschnitt kann archiviert werden. sk 21:02, 26. Okt. 2011 (CEST)

Low Pirority

In the link in the top it says "low pirority", it should be "low priority". Link to the toolserver (problem: → Homepage → svwiki → low pirority) --Fredde 99 19:38, 30. Aug. 2011 (CEST)

 Ok -- sk 21:16, 26. Okt. 2011 (CEST)
Dieser Abschnitt kann archiviert werden. sk 21:16, 26. Okt. 2011 (CEST)
Abgerufen von „https://de.wikiup.org/index.php?title=Benutzer_Diskussion:Stefan_Kühn/Check_Wikipedia/Archiv/2011/August&oldid=97538303“