Benutzer Diskussion:Elijah.B

Free Studio

Ähm, ich will jetzt nicht meckern, aber es ist schon ein bisschen dreist einen neuen Screenshot hochzuladen als JPG, total verpixelt, und dann noch zu schreiben besseres Bild. Aber das ist ja nicht schlimm, aber lies dir mal WP:Screenshots durch. Viele Grüße--Das Schäfchen -- Talk -- Bewertung abgeben 17:19, 28. Aug. 2012 (CEST)

Let it be as it's better in your eyes (though i'm wondered in fact). But I hope you see that the aforementioned JPG -- is not simply pixelated, but specifically processed & sharpened in Photoshop -- looks better in context of the given page, .. it looks more detailed while the PNG - being better in full dimensions - looks blurred when shrunk, like there. B7elijah (Diskussion) 23:04, 28. Aug. 2012 (CEST)

It is not a screenshot in fact, it works as a thumbnail mainly - the major part of readers will just look to this image as it is, without enlarging it. It is located in the info block, and it would be very good to use that PNG also - but somewhere in the article body (my German isn't good enough, please pardon me). B7elijah (Diskussion) 23:14, 28. Aug. 2012 (CEST)