Benutzer Diskussion:Qwirkle
Willkommen!
| Hallo Anmccaff, willkommen in der Wikipedia! | |||
| Danke für dein Interesse an unserem Projekt, ich freue mich schon auf deine weiteren Beiträge. Die folgenden Seiten sollten dir die ersten Schritte erleichtern, bitte nimm dir daher etwas Zeit, sie zu lesen. | |||
 |
Wikipedia:Starthilfe Zugang zu allen wichtigen Informationen. |
 |
Wikipedia:Tutorial Schritt-für-Schritt-Anleitung für Einsteiger. |
 |
Wikipedia:Grundprinzipien Die grundlegende Philosophie unseres Projekts. |
 |
Wikipedia:Mentorenprogramm Persönliche Einführung in die Beteiligung bei Wikipedia. |
|
Bitte beachte, was Wikipedia nicht ist, und unterschreibe deine Diskussionsbeiträge durch Eingabe von | |||
Jeepomotive
[1] There is no "dubious"-Tag in German Wikipedia. Perhaps you want to raise your point on the discussion page? Apart from that, I am afraid that I did not fully understand your point anyway. Regards --Marinebanker (Diskussion) 21:51, 8. Aug. 2015 (CEST)
- My particular point there is that the originator of the page is himself aware of earlier usage, and originally incorporated it in the page, referring to an article about a "stretched jeep" used for coastal patrol. 1945 is not the first time this pun surfaced, and an earlier usage shows in the first version of the article.
- A broader question is the validity of the article name. It appears to have been used just twice for this type of vehicle conversion. I suppose that means it can't be seen etymylogically as a "nonce word," but it's close enough. Wikipedia is not a place for original work, and neologisms are the worst sort of OR.
- This is to pass over the simple mistatements of fact throughout, with Americans in Burma in 1944 reported as Britons in India in 1950, for instance. Anmccaff (Diskussion) 23:54, 8. Aug. 2015 (CEST)
- Thanks for the reply, but as I said, these points are better raised an the article's discussion page. I just happened upon your using a non-existing tag and thought I better give you a heads up. I'm not really involved in this article. Regards --Marinebanker (Diskussion) 21:45, 9. Aug. 2015 (CEST)
- Alas, the article's originator lacks your skills in English, but appears not to know it, and my German is all but nonexistent. Thank you for the information. Anmccaff (Diskussion) 03:33, 10. Aug. 2015 (CEST)
- Thanks for the reply, but as I said, these points are better raised an the article's discussion page. I just happened upon your using a non-existing tag and thought I better give you a heads up. I'm not really involved in this article. Regards --Marinebanker (Diskussion) 21:45, 9. Aug. 2015 (CEST)
Hello! May I remark that moving the page was not only not a good idea, but definitely edit-warring. I would appreciate if you would not change anything in the article in that respect until we have something like a concensus and this is stated on the discussion page. This might eventually make the process easier. Thank you! --Marinebanker (Diskussion) 19:21, 9. Sep. 2015 (CEST)
- Well, I have to say this is another profound difference between the en.wiki and the de.wiki; to be considered "edit warring," they'd have to a series of back-and-forth edits without constructive discussion. Thanks again for your help, and thank you for pointing this out. I'd rather assumed that pointing out that the use of a neologism was not allowed meant it should be changed immediately. Anmccaff (Diskussion) 22:00, 9. Sep. 2015 (CEST)
