Benutzer Diskussion:Stefan Kühn/Check Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/November

aus Wikipedia, der freien Enzyklopädie

crossnamespace links

Hello, Could you add new error - links to another namespaces from articles (like Special:CrossNamespaceLinks)? In articles might be links to categories (like [[Category:XXX]] but not [[:Category:XXX]]) and to pictures. Other links might be included only by templates. JAn Dudík 10:57, 10. Nov. 2009 (CET)

Nice idea. I will try this. -- sk 09:12, 1. Dez. 2009 (CET)

link to zhwiki's translation file

Hello, I want to inform you that the check wikipedia page in zhwiki has been moved to Wikipedia:错误检查专题。Please help updating the link (Currently, name of the page is "维基百科:错误检查专题/翻译") in checkwiki.pl to help checkwiki.pl to locate the translation page on zhwiki. If you need more information or any help, please find me on zhwiki. Thank you very much!--Altt311 14:37, 19. Nov. 2009 (CET)

 Ok, I hope it works. -- sk 22:20, 22. Nov. 2009 (CET)
Oops, I just checked the script and found that the link still needs changes. The page should be "维基百科:错误检查专题/翻译". Sorry for misleading you in my last message.--Altt311 14:17, 23. Nov. 2009 (CET)
The links are still not working. On the new interface for this project, both the Chinese project page and translation page are pointing to the old pages (which are now redirect pages). It's not picking up the translations. The project page is at zh:维基百科:错误检查专题, and the translation page is at zh:维基百科:错误检查专题/翻译. "维基百科" is the Chinese name of the Wikipedia namespace. Thanks in advance for fixing this. --Vina 02:47, 29. Nov. 2009 (CET)
Sorry, I had in the last days no time to fix this. I hope I can fix this tonight. -- sk 09:12, 1. Dez. 2009 (CET)
 Ok, I hope it works. -- sk 22:10, 1. Dez. 2009 (CET)

Please vote!

Hello to all contributors of Check Wikipedia. At the moment I think about the translation of the new interface in all languages. The problem is: the projectpages need Wikisyntax and the new interface need XHTML-Syntax. I don't want handle both, because this means redundancy and this is not good. I think it will be the best to stop the support of wikisyntax-output because in many languages the output is also very long (en, fr, zh, ja). Then we can switch the translation to XHTML and all wikipedians work with the new interface. Also no more daily update of the projectpages is need.

I will ask you what you want!

  1. Support only new interface (XHTML)
  2. Support both (Wikisyntax and XHTML)

Please vote for one. The vote end 2009-10-31 12:00 UTC.

Is there any update yet? --Superyetkin 00:25, 9. Nov. 2009 (CET)
Yes, I have test the interface-link from API for parsing Wikisyntax into XHTML. This work very well. I work at the update in the script, but maybe it will be finish in 7 or more days. Thanks to user AwOc. -- sk 21:08, 9. Nov. 2009 (CET)
Is there any chance you can run the script for Turkish wiki? It has been inactive for a week now. --Superyetkin 21:49, 9. Nov. 2009 (CET)
In the last days the toolserver was more then one time rebooted. The script is now at ptwiki. After ro, ru, sk, sv it will scan trwiki. I think this tomorrow it is ready. -- sk 22:00, 9. Nov. 2009 (CET)
Is there anything you can do to scan trwiki? It has been more than 9 days since the last scan was performed. --Superyetkin 23:07, 11. Nov. 2009 (CET)

Support only new interface (XHTML)

  1. sk 21:19, 12. Okt. 2009 (CEST)
  2. Andim 21:54, 12. Okt. 2009 (CEST)
  3. Welsh 21:45, 22. Okt. 2009 (CEST) Real time is better than updates every few days. I have stopped using the wiki version
  4. Vina 01:13, 23. Okt. 2009 (CEST) I only look at the wiki version to see the up/down trends for errors now.
  5. LSG1 22:42, 25. Okt. 2009 (CET) See Welsh
  6. --Superyetkin 15:54, 26. Okt. 2009 (CET)
  7. --Kostpolt 14:08, 29. Okt. 2009 (CET)
  8. --Sevela.p 00:21, 13. Nov. 2009 (CET)
  9. Altt311 10:42, 22. Nov. 2009 (CET)
  10. Krinkle 01:26, 17. Jan. 2010 (CET) - This new toolserver-version is a lot better, and it also supports a "Done" button, and organisation for the users. Though marking things as done can be done on-wiki, I believe this is a time saver ! Great job.

Support both (Wikisyntax and XHTML)

  1. ...

Talk

i think it might be a big security-problem if you put xhtml which can be edited by anyone on a website (as it is now). you should find a better solution, like allow only limited html-tags. --xAwOc 21:29, 12. Okt. 2009 (CEST)

This is right, but I think It is an wiki and many people can watch this translation pages. Did you have a better solution?
do not allow html-tags, except some limited selected ones like <small>, <a href="http://">, …. you could translate all other to html like &lt; and &gt;. then there are some weired solutions left, but a simple <script src="example.com/evil.js" /> would'nt work. other possibility: leave it as wiki-text and parse it to html, maybe there is an api-funtion for this. and i don't think that there are enough people watching the translation pages on all wikis. some are only edited by you and me. --xAwOc 22:07, 12. Okt. 2009 (CEST)
Why not support only wikitext for the new interface? It is a problem with the parse-modul of the api? When merge text and then split them it is possible with less querys. When support free html text it is a good idea to have a Sanitizer, that is the way MediaWiki support free text. Der Umherirrende 22:11, 12. Okt. 2009 (CEST)
I don't know the pars-modul. But the problem of "evil.js" is also there. Maybe I can parse this and only links to wikipedia allowed. At the moment many people can translate the descriptions, this is very good and I want this also for the new interface. But how! -- sk 22:22, 12. Okt. 2009 (CEST)
mw:API:Parsing_wikitext#parse, seems easy to use, no login needed. just call it like this and get the <text xml:space="preserve">…</text> part for every variable you get from the translation-page. at links it is neccesary to add the server. --xAwOc 22:42, 12. Okt. 2009 (CEST)
I will try at the weekend the parsing funktion. Thanks for this info. -- sk 21:50, 14. Okt. 2009 (CEST)
This work very well. I will implement this in the next time. -- sk 22:05, 8. Nov. 2009 (CET)

We discussed the possibility to use the new interface on :fr a bit and some people said the fact they were no backlog was braking the switch. A2 19:34, 17. Okt. 2009 (CEST)

What did you mean with backlog? Did you mean, that you can not see who repair the errors? Or an other thing? Please describe the problem better for me. -- sk 09:24, 18. Okt. 2009 (CEST)
I don't really know why people want to wait. One person said that is was vital to have a traceability for the project and that the logs of the project pages (history) were doing it well. But I disagree with this, edits made on project pages prove nothing, only edits on articles. So I don't really understand the problem. Some others talk of having a translated page on the new interface before telling people to use it. This night I tried to add a kind of edit button on detections pages (diff) but now pages are heavier to load so I don't know if we'll keep this. A2 13:50, 18. Okt. 2009 (CEST)
Abgerufen von „https://de.wikiup.org/index.php?title=Benutzer_Diskussion:Stefan_Kühn/Check_Wikipedia/Archiv/2009/November&oldid=72026721“