Diskussion:Max Adler (Jurist)

Sozialchauvinismus

I have some issues with Max Adler being described as fighting 'Sozialchauvinismus' , this is a doctrinaire marxist term and is not, in any way, a neutral description. In this sense, I dispute the neutrality of this article. I think 'Jergen' is erroneous in removing my remark that Adler consistently and continuously combated the Weimar parliamentary democracy. If in doubt check the original text of his debate with Hermann Heller on the JuSo Konferenz of 12th & 13th of April 1925 in Jena (text of both Referaten to be found in Heller Hermann Gesammelte Schriften vol. I pg's 527-553). I have restored the 'qoutes' around the terms 'Sozialchauvinisumus' and 'Reformismus', as I`m of the opinion that that best serves the Wiki NPOV (Neutral Point of View) ; I`m willing to let the remark concerning parliamentray democracy rest, it is implied in the remark concerning political democracry and social democracy.

kind regards

Jan-Jaap van Peperstraten

(nicht signierter Beitrag von Isolani~dewiki (Diskussion | Beiträge) 11:21, 5. Jul. 2005)